Monday, May 11, 2026 
Bitcoin MACD
Log inSign up free
ChartsLearnNewsPricing
ChartsLearnNewsPricingSupportSign UpTermsPrivacy
BitcoinEthereumCardanoChainlinkSolanaXRPTRONDogecoinCosmosHyperliquidOndo FinanceAvalanche

Bitcoin MACD provides technical indicator signals, not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. MACD signals do not beat buy-and-hold for BTC on average. Always do your own research before making investment decisions. Bitcoin MACD is not liable for any financial losses resulting from the use of this service, nor for any failure or delay in delivering alerts or notifications.

Data: Polygon.io · support@bitcoinmacd.com · © 2026 Bitcoin MACD

← Learn/Coins

Coins · 6 min read

Q2 2022: When the Signal Mattered Most

BTC started April 2022 around $46,000. By the end of June, it was under $20,000. A 56.8% wipeout in one quarter. ETH was worse — down 69.0%. ADA lost 60.5%. LINK dropped 63.8%.

This is the quarter that justifies the entire system.

The Setup

Coming into Q2 2022, the mood was cautious but not panicked. BTC had pulled back from its $69K all-time high in November 2021, spending the winter drifting between $35K and $47K. People were calling it a "healthy correction." The word "bottom" showed up in crypto Twitter every other day.

Under the surface, things were fragile. Luna's algorithmic stablecoin was holding — barely. FTX was still the golden child. Inflation was running hot and the Fed was signaling rate hikes. But the crash hadn't happened yet. Most holders were still in wait-and-see mode.

Our signals weren't waiting.

The Signal Fires

As BTC's price started weakening in early April, the MACD histogram began shrinking. Momentum was fading — the speedometer was dropping. The MACD line crossed below the signal line. Bearish crossover. Exit signal.

The system didn't know about Luna. It didn't know about FTX contagion. It didn't have an opinion on the Fed. It saw one thing: momentum was pointing down. So it got out.

That's the whole play. No prediction. No macro thesis. Just a systematic rule: when the MACD line crosses below the signal line, exit to cash.

The Crash

What happened next was brutal. Luna collapsed in May, taking its $18 billion ecosystem to zero in days. The contagion spread — Three Arrows Capital, Celsius, Voyager, all went down like dominoes. BTC fell from the mid-$30s to below $20K. ETH went from $2,800 to under $1,000.

If you were holding through it, you felt every day of that decline. The daily portfolio checks. The "should I sell now or is this the bottom?" paralysis. The 3 AM phone checks.

If you'd followed the bearish crossover signal, you were in cash. Watching the crash from the sidelines. Not making money — cash earns 0%. But not losing 57% either.

The Scoreboard

Here's what the quarter looked like across all our tracked assets:

Asset Buy-and-Hold Return MACD+ADX Strategy Alpha
BTC -56.8% +34.77%
ETH -69.0% +29.25%
ADA -60.5% +27.63%
LINK -63.8% +34.09%

Every asset. 20-35% positive alpha across the board. That's the smoke detector going off before the house burns down.

The alpha isn't 57% — you don't avoid the entire crash, because the exit signal fires after momentum has already started declining, not at the exact top. By the time MACD crosses bearish, the price has usually already dropped a few percent. That's the cost of using a lagging indicator. But catching 35% of a 57% crash? That's still the difference between a bad quarter and a devastating one.

What Happened After

The re-entry is where things got more nuanced. BTC bounced around the $20K level through the summer. MACD fired a few bullish crossovers, but ADX was low — the trend wasn't strong enough to qualify. The system stayed in cash through several false bounces.

Eventually, the trend established. ADX climbed above 20. A bullish crossover fired with conviction. The system re-entered.

Was the re-entry timing perfect? No. The system doesn't catch bottoms any better than it catches tops. But it avoided the worst of the crash and re-entered when the data showed a real trend forming. Not a hope. Not a gut feeling. A measurable trend.

The Honest Caveat

Q2 2022 is the best single quarter in our five-year backtest. It's the proof point for bearish signal detection. We lean on it because the data is genuinely impressive.

But we need to be honest about something: this is one quarter out of twenty. BTC's mean quarterly alpha is -1.89% — most individual quarters slightly underperform buy-and-hold. Over the full five years, the total alpha is +46.32% because quarters like this one generate outsized gains. But the quarterly experience is mostly small drag punctuated by occasional big wins.

If you're evaluating whether this system is worth using, don't look at Q2 2022 alone. Look at all 20 quarters. We show them all in Honest About Our Performance. The bearish signal detection story is real, but it's part of a larger picture that includes flat quarters, losing quarters, and the Q4 2023 quarter where every asset's signals misfired simultaneously.

In Q2 2022, BTC dropped 56.8% and our bearish crossover signal got users out early — +34.77% alpha. That's the smoke detector working. It doesn't go off every day, but when it does, it matters.


This is educational content, not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Now that you understand how this works — get notified when it fires →

Next

What Is RWA Tokenization?